Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Close your eyes and think about a voice that once stopped you cold. Maybe it was Aretha Franklin pulling something sacred out of a secular lyric. Maybe it was Whitney Houston on a Sunday morning, her voice climbing toward something that felt less like performance and more like prayer answered in real time. Maybe it was Al Green, making you feel simultaneously convicted and comforted in a way you still can’t fully explain.
Now open a playlist of today’s R&B.
Something is missing. You’ve probably felt it without being able to name it — that specific hunger after a song ends, the sense that you were entertained but not reached. You were fed, but not filled. The production is often extraordinary. The vocal technique is frequently impressive. And yet. The music sits on the surface of you rather than moving through you. There’s a reason for that, and it’s more structural than sentimental. It’s more cultural than generational. Simply put: R&B has left the church. And the music is suffering for it.
Before R&B was a genre, it was a practice. The Black church wasn’t just where artists learned to sing — it was where they learned what singing was for. The mechanics alone were a full curriculum: breath control, call-and-response, the tension between restraint and release, the discipline of knowing when to hold back so that when you finally let go, the room had no choice but to respond. Aretha absorbed this at New Bethel Baptist under her father’s roof before she ever stepped near a recording studio. Whitney’s first audiences were congregations who needed the music to actually do something — to comfort the grieving, to anchor the uncertain, to lift what couldn’t be lifted by ordinary words. Marvin Gaye grew up the son of a preacher, and that tension between the sacred and the secular defined his entire catalog. It made the music electric precisely because it was unresolved.
The church, critically, also gave artists their first real feedback loop. A congregation doesn’t just listen — it responds. You learn early and quickly whether you are reaching people or merely performing at them. That’s not a small distinction. That’s the whole thing.
That pipeline — from pew to recording studio — has largely dried up. What replaced it was social media, talent competitions, and an industry that optimizes relentlessly for virality over vulnerability. Algorithms reward hooks and aesthetics. They don’t reward sustained emotional arc. They don’t reward the kind of patience the church imposed: sitting in the choir for years, watching, waiting, earning your moment at the microphone. That formation shaped what artists did when they finally got there. When you come up in an ecosystem that gives you a platform before you’ve been formed by anything larger than your own ambition, it shows in the music. The songs become hermetically sealed — technically competent, emotionally tidy, unable to breathe outward toward the listener.
There’s also a vocabulary problem. The theological language of R&B — redemption, lament, covenant, deliverance — didn’t just provide lyrical content. It shaped the emotional range artists believed they were allowed to inhabit. When you grow up inside a tradition that holds grief and joy simultaneously, that teaches you suffering can be transformed rather than simply escaped, you make different music than someone who learned to sing by chasing trends on a phone screen.
Here’s where it gets complicated, and worth sitting with: church influence never meant safe music. Let’s be clear about that. Ray Charles didn’t sanitize the church when he made “I Got a Woman” — he dragged it into the honky-tonk and made it wrestle with desire and longing, and the friction was the music. The Blues was born in the same communities, often the same families, as the Gospel. That sacred-and-secular tension wasn’t a contradiction to be resolved — it was the engine. Al Green became a literal pastor and kept making R&B. D’Angelo spent years studying Black church musical tradition before recording Voodoo, which many still consider the last great spiritual reclamation in the genre. The point was never wholesomeness. The point was depth. The point was music willing to hold contradictions — joy and grief, surrender and resistance, the sacred and the profane — without flinching away from any of it.
Most modern R&B doesn’t hold contradictions. It resolves them too quickly, or avoids them altogether. The result is music that’s easy to absorb and easy to forget.
The audience feels this. You feel this. And the dismissal of that feeling as mere nostalgia has always been too convenient. When people say “they don’t make music like they used to,” they’re often criticized for romanticizing the past. But there’s a structural reason for the loss, not just a sentimental one. The emotional transaction has genuinely changed. Classic R&B asked you to feel with the artist — to bring your own grief, your own longing, your own hallelujah into contact with theirs. Much of contemporary R&B asks you to admire the artist. That’s a fundamentally different relationship, and the human nervous system knows the difference even when the conscious mind doesn’t.
The neo-soul movement of the late nineties and early 2000s — Lauryn Hill, Erykah Badu, Maxwell, D’Angelo — was the last moment the industry produced church-formed or church-influenced depth at anything like commercial scale. And we have been collectively grieving its end ever since, whether we name it that or not. Kirk Franklin’s crossover success is proof that when depth is offered, audiences show up hungry for it. The success of The Color Purple revival made theaters feel like revival meetings because people were starving for that kind of emotional weight. The appetite never left. The supply did.
So where does that leave us? Is there a way back, or only a way forward?
Probably both, and probably neither is easy. Some artists are quietly carrying the tradition — Ledisi, Jonathan McReynolds, and others who are less interested in the algorithm than in the emotional truth of what they’re making. Black church choir culture remains a living incubator of everything the genre needs. The question is whether anyone in a position of industry power is paying attention, or whether the economics of streaming have made depth too risky to fund.
But the audience carries responsibility too. Our habits have trained the machine. Every skip, every playlist curated for ambiance rather than feeling, every stream we give to something comfortable instead of something true — it adds up to a signal. The industry hears it and responds accordingly. Demanding more from music means being willing to sit with music that doesn’t let you off the hook emotionally, and that takes a kind of patience that our current consumption culture actively discourages.
This editorial is not asking artists to go to church. It’s asking something harder: go somewhere that teaches you what music is for. Find the formation that the church once provided — the community, the accountability, the long apprenticeship in holding human emotion honestly. Find the tradition that insists your voice is not just your instrument but your offering, and that an offering that costs you nothing is worth exactly that.
R&B was born at the intersection of the sacred and the deeply human. It was always meant to do what Sunday morning does — to take what you carried in and transform it into something you could carry out. The music hasn’t lost its potential. It’s lost its source.
Come back to the well. The congregation is still thirsty.
His Win, His Work: Stop Putting an Asterisk on Michael B. Jordan’s Oscar